首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus 'normal calls' within the Swedish Healthcare Direct : a case–control study
【2h】

A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus 'normal calls' within the Swedish Healthcare Direct : a case–control study

机译:瑞典医疗保健直通电话中针对不当行为索赔的电话与“正常电话”的比较:病例对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare communication patterns in calls subjected to a malpractice claim with matched controls. Setting: In many countries, telephone advice nursing is patients' first contact with healthcare. Telenurses' assessment of callers' symptoms and needs are based on verbal communication only, and problems with over-triage and under-triage have been reported. Participants: A total sample of all reported medical errors (n=33) during the period 2003-2010 within Swedish Healthcare Direct was retrieved. Corresponding calls were thereafter identified and collected as sound files from the manager in charge at the respective call centres. For technical reasons, calls from four of the cases were not possible to retrieve. For the present study, matched control calls (n=26) based on the patient's age, gender and main symptom presented by the caller were collected. Results: Male patients were in majority (n=16), and the most common reasons for calling were abdominal pain (n=10) and chest pain (n=5). There were statistically significant differences between the communication in the cases and controls: telenurses used fewer open-ended medical questions (p<0.001) in the cases compared to the control calls; callers provided telenurses with more medical information in the control calls compared to the cases (p=0.001); and telenurses used more facilitation and patient activation activities in the control calls (p=0.034), such as back-channel response (p=0.001), compared to the cases. Conclusions: The present study shows that telenurses in malpractice claimed calls used more closed-ended questioning compared to those in control calls, who used more open-ended questioning and back-channel response, which provided them with richer medical descriptions and more information from the caller. Hence, these communicative techniques are important in addition to solid medical and nursing competence and sound decision aid systems.
机译:目标:这项研究的目的是将发生不当行为索赔的呼叫中的通信模式与匹配的控件进行比较。地点:在许多国家/地区,电话咨询护理是患者首次接触医疗保健。 Telenurses对呼叫者的症状和需求的评估仅基于口头交流,并且已经报道了过度分类和分类不足的问题。参与者:检索了2003-2010年期间在瑞典医疗保健直通网中报告的所有医疗错误的总样本(n = 33)。此后,相应的呼叫被识别并从相应呼叫中心的主管经理那里收集为声音文件。由于技术原因,无法检索到其中四个案件的电话。在本研究中,根据患者的年龄,性别和呼叫者呈现的主要症状,收集了匹配的对照呼叫(n = 26)。结果:男性患者占多数(n = 16),最常见的呼叫原因是腹痛(n = 10)和胸痛(n = 5)。病例与对照组之间的交流存在统计学上的显着差异:与对照组相比,远程神经在病例中使用的开放式医疗问题更少(p <0.001);与案例相比,呼叫者在控制呼叫中为远程神经提供了更多的医疗信息(p = 0.001);与案例相比,远程护理在控制呼叫中使用了更多的促进和患者激活活动(p = 0.034),例如反向信道响应(p = 0.001)。结论:本研究表明,与控制呼叫相比,在渎职索赔电话中使用的远程护理使用了更​​多封闭式询问,而在控制呼叫中使用了更多开放式询问和反向通道响应,这为他们提供了更丰富的医学描述和更多信息。呼叫者。因此,除了坚实的医疗和护理能力以及完善的决策辅助系统外,这些交流技术也很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号